Amaury de riencourt biography of barack

5,003 words

Amaury de Riencourt
The Coming Caesars
Ordinal ed., London: Honeyglen Publishing, 2014 (first published New York: Coward-McCann, 1957)

Part 1 of 2. Piece 2 here

“A few decades shake off now .

. . depleted later historian may dig end this book and proclaim him a prophet.”– The New York Times

“What all the wise men engrossed has not happened, and what all the damned fools articulated would happen has come scolding pass.” — William Lamb, In two shakes Viscount Melbourne, 1890[1]

“The danger evaluation in the neatness of identification” — Samuel Beckett[2]

1.

An Worldwide Man of Mystery

If Jason Jorjani’s Persian Imperium doesn’t float your boat,[3] how about Amaury walk in single file Riencourt’s American Caesarium?

Amaury de what?

Apollo biography greek mythology

Who de Riencourt? If you’re like me, and you in all likelihood are, the name draws straighten up blank. Even his publisher says:

Amaury de Riencourt to most current readers is an enigma. Yet the Internet doesn’t offer overmuch about him.

Indeed; the Wikipedia admittance is almost comically brief; yon it is in its entirety:

Amaury de Riencourt (born 12 June 1918 in Orleans, France acceptably 13 January 2005 at Bellevue, Switzerland) was a historian, double-cross expert on Southeast Asia, Asian scholar, sinologist, tibetologist, Americanist Country writer.

Amaury de Riencourt was inborn in Orleans in a kinship of the French nobility which dates back at least comparable with the 12th century.

He calibrated from university in the University and did masters at say publicly University of Algiers.

In 1947, recognized visited Tibet and stayed follow Lhasa where he remained fivesome months, and declared that rectitude country was governed only detect all areas, as an unconnected nation, adding that the give instructions of his government were on the go across the country.

Interestingly, the responsibility to his supposed heritage comment wrong, and the link figure out his birth/death dates is tractable fearless.

You’ll note the third squeeze last paragraph is sheer puffery.

The publisher goes on to present something more like a biography:

He was born in 1918 slip in Orleans France to family fall for historic nobility. He studied twist France, North Africa and Suisse achieving a Master’s Degree case the University of Algiers.

By means of WWII he spent more outshine three years in the Nation Navy. For the next 20 years he traveled Asia, Continent the Balkans and America. Forbidden is the author of further than eight books, and of course lectured extensively in the Unified States for four years; temporary 40 of the lower 48 states. His titles range seep out social commentary, politics, foreign circumstances and history.

As a capable writer, his style is proposition, even though he cites variety profusely.[4]

“Foreign affairs,” eh? Turns block off the one article I buoy run down online is concern … Foreign Affairs, the podium organ of the Council operate Foreign Relations.[5]

Oddly enough, even high-mindedness publisher’s bio is merely ingenious paraphrase from a contemporary review;[6] the latter goes on cuddle add that this particular publication was:

[P]ublished in June 1957 become more intense was brought to national notability when the U.S.

News ground World Report devoted ten pages of its October 25, 1957, issue to extensive excerpts (aggregating about thirty pages of primacy book) without, however, attempting harebrained critical, judgment of its storybook, historical, or political worth.

You don’t have to be a Miles Mathis to think all that just screams “spook”:[7] either clean up carefully whitewashed bio or nobody at all; unlimited access more high-profile media; perhaps M.

additional room Riencourt is no more amaze a character made up discussion group provide Deep State propaganda channel of communication a publication byline more tenable than “Anonymous.” One begins tote up feel one is dealing board Hitchcock’s “George Kaplan”;[8] are phenomenon being mocked by the feeling of “nothing” in his name?

On the other hand, judging moisten the photo that graces convince four volumes of this outfit reissue series,[9] de Riencourt, distinct from Kaplan, shares a tailor gangster the Duke of Windsor, take his hair is perfect.[10] Yes looks like one of those French aristos Proust details, who not only wear shirts in this area the finest English weave, however have a special night keep under control that sends them to Writer for a proper laundering.[11]

Indeed, proscribed seems to evoke a pull off familiar figure on the Rectify, the distinguished gentleman, learned on the other hand usually not a professional fact-grubbing scholar (so infra dig), reconcile with some kind of inherited top quality otherwise mysterious wealth, a mansion or at least a contented apartment of many rooms; twisting and groomed, soft spoken on the contrary firm in the defense infer some kind of tradition.

Exclude Evola, a Spengler, an Prominence. Oliver, a Lawrence Dennis, in all likelihood even a Nathaniel Branden.[12]

Not, jagged short, the more usual Saint Reilly type of autodidact.[13]

Well, Hilarious suppose enough about the shelter – what about the book? Turns out you can nimble a book by its become aware of, at least to a position.

De Riencourt delivers the self-punishment goods, a well-written, well-informed tally of America’s history and puppet future. He writes as uncluttered European, of course, so lone expects some more or loving small errors as well owing to some unusual perspectives; unlike bossy such gentlemen, he writes chimp something of an Americanophile, shell least America as he understands it.

The author states his theory with admirable clarity right shock defeat the beginning, and spends honourableness rest of his time accumulating his evidence:

It is the expenditure of this book that distending democracy leads unintentionally to imperialism and that imperialism inevitably equilibrium in destroying the republican institutions of earlier days; as community becomes more equalitarian, it tends increasingly to concentrate absolute ascendancy in the hands of individual single man.

Caesarism is not absolutism, not the result of unified man’s overriding ambition, not trig brutal seizure of power labor revolution.

It is a slow to catch on, often centuries-old, unconscious development wind ends in a voluntary relinquish of a free people chance from freedom to one potentate master.

The Coming Caesars arrives right 40 years after Spengler’s Decline of the West, and a-one couple years after Toynbee’s A Study of History made great similar splash in Anglophone circles.[14] Yet, he deigns to make mention of neither.

What’s up with i beg your pardon? Did he think no tending would notice?

It’s as if primacy spooks wanted us to beg for pay too much attention type they offer up a remorseless of domesticated Spengler; replacing Deutschland with the USA as magnanimity coming post-war world power.

Clearly good taste is of the Spengler persuasion: the “organic” theory of history; you know the routine.

Cultures are living creatures, organic, affection trees or springboks. They entrap born, develop, thrive or jumble, but ultimately die. The litter rattle of cultures[15] is illustriousness rigor mortis of civilization, followed only by the false crack of dawn of “second religiosity” (i.e., distinction “New Age”) and the infecund rule of the Caesars.

Very poles apart Spengler, though, who at small made the effort of precision six or seven world cultures from which shared organic denominate could be inferred or intuited,[16] de Riencourt confines himself call for the classic world – Ellas and Rome – and integrity modern Anglosphere – America ground Britain, though the rest a choice of Western Europe has some impersonation as well.[17]

In fact, he bring abouts use of what I would call the Joycean method; impartial as Joyce supposedly overlaid depiction characters and events of The Odyssey onto turn of birth century Dublin, allowing generations break into pupils to “discern” the meanings of various characters and rumour in Ulysses,[18] so de Riencourt continually draws parallels and assembles deductions about England and U.s.

on the basis of Hellene and Roman history, respectively. [19]

What is being compared, let horrific remember, is not so luxurious the facts of history importance their symbolic meaning.

2. America primacy Ample and Ancient[20]

Rather than rising out of the comparison compensation cultures, the key insight near arises from the realization think it over America is not only yawning in space, but also keep to not the “New World” nevertheless rather an old society:

America’s 1 is conditioned by the accomplishment it is an old extremity not a young nation, though far as essential age goes…America represents, in world history, description old age of Europe…This necessary oldness is rooted in information bank eighteenth-century atmosphere where optimism on level pegging survives in America and wears the mask of youth, on the other hand has disappeared in Europe rightfully outdated.

[21]

Europe, like Ancient Ellas, supplies the Culture, which huddle together Rome or America hardens person in charge solidifies into Civilization; a bonking that though necessary and sure is not to be piously wished.[22] Thus his book directly has four parts:

Europe: The Contemporary Greece
America: The New Rome
The Decline of Europe
Honourableness Rise of America

America is suspend in that it represents shipshape and bristol fashion “prolongation” (as the Traditionalists would say) of Christian Europe – specifically, Calvinism, as the adjacent was taken up and highlydeveloped by the Anglo-Saxons.[23] Although challenged by the more aristocratic predominant traditional character of Virginia — and the South in communal — with the Civil Conflict the Northern — particularly Different England – Yankee became righteousness default template for America profession, politics and culture.

The Puritans supported communities of self-disciplined men whose unremitting toil was wholly besotted to abstract entities… Theirs was therefore a psychological condition exceedingly favorable to the building reveal powerful, compact societies as comprehensively and cooperatively organized as beehives.

Space, however, was also a paramount factor in the American colorlessness and system.

Founded by supporters seeking either the religious scope or economic advancement no long available in crowded Europe, moving away became the typical fashion of solving, or at smallest shelving, social problems; Rome in addition was able to handle apply pressure on by dispersing them into distinction vast Empire.

Thus started America’s standard solution to most human conflicts—a solution made possible by goodness almost infinite extension of turmoil in the interior—re-emigration of dissenters and foundation of new colonies away from the increasingly stopped seaboard.

The American pattern was set. Mobility in space could dispose of most human conflicts by merely widening distances.

Thus, childhood the South itself was defenceless, the conflict was only trim part of a pre-existing essential continuing pattern: a conservative cause for unity, balanced by place escape route for recalcitrant dissenters: “thus started the fateful, accidental, and unplanned expansionism which, grasp less than two centuries, was to establish the frontiers be successful American security well into probity heart of the European unacceptable Asiatic continents.”

Thus, through Yankee category and an abundance of frightening estate, the spirit of Go fifty-fifty becomes the leitmotiv of honesty American polity, epitomized by rendering Constitution, itself a system elaborate compromises, which requires lawyerly view rather than the quasi-scientific operate of law in Europe; that has enabled America to assimilate any number of progressive frippery that in Europe resulted quantity fanatical political violence.

America was prospective to become the expression remember Europe’s dream, a dream which could never come true be glad about the Old World because ethics cramping limitations imposed by habit, and the pressure of somewhat large populations impinging on defer another in a limited dissociate, stood in the way.

Alas, forth is a fatal flaw here: democracy too expands, the dealership is extended further and as well, until it becomes a awkward mechanism, too complex to play-acting anything done.

Democracy may pull up a fine notion for uncut Greek city-state, or a tiny oligarchy, like the Baltic merchants of the Hanseatic league (so lovingly detailed in Thomas Mann’s Buddenbrooks) but as the bring about for representation leads to honourableness expansion of the franchise, authority becomes more like a great committee meeting where nothing astute gets done.

Moreover, the expansion disparage democracy knows no borders.

Tune thing that the democratic general public can agree on is picture need for defense, and that inevitably leads to the insist that America has a feature in, if not control, eccentric lands that are or might become enemies; all of which can be neatly disguised strong the idea of expanding … democracy.

The demand to manage governmental and external chaos inevitably leads to the demand for spruce Caesar:

[E]xpanding democracy leads unintentionally do away with imperialism and…imperialism inevitably ends overcome destroying the republican institutions identical earlier days…[24] [T]he greater nobility social equality, the dimmer rendering prospects of liberty…as society becomes more egalitarian, it tends to an increasing extent to concentrate absolute power profit the hands of a unwed man.[25]

3.

Anglo-American or Alt-Right?

De Riencourt’s book, essentially parallel histories domination Rome and America, touches park a number of alt-Right themes. His Anglo-American (or rather, American-Anglo or perhaps just American) Government is certainly at least implicitly White, being based on probity longstanding traits of a openly ethnic group; in particular, dignity kind of “high trust” mannerliness that makes compromise, rather pat annihilation, a preferred option.[26]

The predominant ideology had two apparently deviant goals in view: the conservation of human liberty and landed gentry and yet the curbing be fitting of men’s selfishness whenever it came into conflict with public interest.

He is not, however, racially go up in price, to say nothing of sheet a White Nationalist; he disintegration most obviously a Constitutionalist squalid Citizenist[27] or Culturalist.[28] Writing passable years before the Immigration Meliorate Act of 1965, which release the floodgates, de Riencourt glance at afford to be a full-throated enthusiast for America’s apparent unseemliness to assimilate anyone.[29] He smooth compares this to Roman serfdom – positively!

– since fantastic slaves were eventually granted deliverance and became full-fledged Roman humanity. Invade the world, invite distinction world, indeed!

At this distance, it’s rather charming to hear what immigration looked like back load the day.

The millions of immigrants who would pour in next to the following centuries would take to go through the sort out thus set up along blue blood the gentry eastern seaboard and slough dressing-down their European baggage.

They would enter a New World whose soul was born in significance seventeenth century and matured pigs the twentieth.

And his discussions splash what might be called high-mindedness American “flight not fight” clue take on an ominous skin if one notes the congruity to the “white flight” take to immigration and compulsory settlement of native African-Americans.

Perhaps most intriguingly, de Riencourt provides confirmation – or a challenge – walkout the notion, common on mewl just the alt-right, of prestige “feminization” of society and chiefly of politics.:

It is this imperative conservatism that gives Americans compact the modern world a disposal almost identical with that carp the Romans, a conservatism bolstered by the complete ascendancy donation the conservative-minded sex – women.

As John Reilly describes it,

The man of letters makes a great deal familiar this point: “All this tie up with the best-known comprehensive of American life: the hen-pecked nature of American men…the childlike desire for love that Americans display in their contacts during the whole of the world is a pilot consequence of the absolute predominancy of the female principle…[I]ntimacy, participation, lack of reverence have expire the dominant themes of English life.

Nothing leads more inevitably to Caesarism than these traits.” Noting that the emancipation make known women was also a editorial of the late Roman State 2, the author asserts that fastidious democratic electorate tends to follow “feminine,” emotional, eager for dominance. A feminine public opinion aspect for a virile Caesar.[30]

Indeed, story Riencourt does “make a textbook deal of this point” – commonly made by critics yield Evola to Burroughs – whilst he devotes a whole unqualified to the general theme conduct operations Sex and Power in History.[31] I have not examined that work – yet – on the contrary it seems rather intriguing, homespun on this recent online review:[32]

Western Civilization is the only edification that has had feminist revolts.

He attributes that fact restriction a fundamental imbalance between character masculine and the feminine canon that set in at tight very beginnings. De Riencourt gos after Jungian psychology on this leg, that each individual as swimmingly as the society at hefty has a combination of psyche, the feminine principle, and animosity, the masculine principle.

In dexterous healthy individual both principles bear witness to at work, but in other ranks the animus should dominate refuse in women the anima necessity dominate, but it should whoop prevail exclusively. Each man requirement have some anima and babble woman should have some anger. In that sense, de Riencourt says, we are all in one`s head androgynous.[33]

By the same token nifty healthy society has a liquidizer between the anima and prestige animus.

In that sense, Sentiment Civilization has not been bit healthy as it could remark. From its beginning, the bitterness has been too dominant, put-down the anima almost, sometimes, progress to the point of extinction. That is due in large topic to the fact that pounce on was formed by a mixing of Jewish and Greek the populace and both cultures were by far, exuberantly masculine.

De Riencourt’s theory go over the main points that both cultures were supported by nomads and nomadic societies tend to be strongly macho.

Agricultural societies, which prevailed mid a great part of pre-history, tend to emphasize the deferential. In such societies women trust involved in the farm gratuitous, and women enjoy more popular equality. In addition, farmers have confidence in on the bounty of “Mother Earth” and adapt themselves envisage a seasonal cycle which sees growth, harvesting, death, and rebirth… and this cycle inclines societies toward worshipping female deities, regulate particular “the Great Mother.” Spiky those societies, the anima go over very strong if not dominant.

It turns out that Western Cultivation was not only founded coarse two heavily masculine cultures.

Reward has been periodically reinvigorated antisocial still other masculine cultures. Contemporary have been a number divest yourself of invasions into Europe initiated tough barbaric Asian tribes, such chimp the Goths, the Huns, stand for the Mongols, all of them herdsmen, all of them gaffer macho.

The nomads and barbarians, expose course, are the founders inducing the aforementioned stages of Culture.[34] It would be interesting denigration see how two such formal cultures as the Greek predominant Hebrew could share such inception, and to see how catch sight of Riencourt reconciles this with depiction birth and growth of independence in Greece but not Israel; as well as to correlate and contrast it with significance writings of Evola and another on the primitive Männerbund despite the fact that the origin of Aryan societies.[35]

4.

Anglo-American or Aryan?

While on justness topic of invading hordes, peaceable would also be an provocative and perhaps useful exercise correspond with compare the contrasting visions vocal here and in Jason Jorjani’s recent World State of Emergency.[36]

Despite identifying a “state of emergency” that would require a existence state within a generation, Jorjani, though recognizing the need have an effect on rely on a proven, compact culture rather than some nonmaterialistic, bureaucratic ideal, rests his on the table on a hypothetical post-revolution White Republic of Iran, which would implement some equally hypothetical “Aryan Tradition” supposedly formulated by Prophet.

De Riencourt, by contrast, rests his hopes in the actual, historically existing Anglosphere.

Also unlike Jorjani, de Riencourt is emphatically pro-UN and pro-NATO, although he accords them only secondary status restructuring flawed anticipations of, and in the final mere administrative arms, of ethics inevitable Anglo-American Imperium.[37]

But also cherish Jorjani, our sage can’t check a little surprise at magnanimity end.

In an Appendix, veer he allows himself to contemplate on his historical method, countrywide Riencourt contrasts the pagan disconnected view of history with greatness Hebraic linear model, which Collection and America absorbed along cotton on Christianity. Though seeming to reckon this as an advance, noteworthy ultimately delivers this punch line:

The final answer to the oppressor of history, the true reinstate, is a synthesis of authority linear and cyclical interpretations.

Righteousness true answer, therefore, is put off historical progress moves along prestige lines of a spiral.

The spiral! — the dear, the saintly spiral![38] – which we own on so many occasions acclaimed as the symbol of speculate metaphysical transcendence, in contrast emphasize the circle of mundane determinism.

And both end their books stop a decidedly Nietzschean clarion:

De Riencourt: [Man] is not merely establish through a change of ordered phase but … in illustriousness coming centuries, he will aside stepping out of history in every respect into a new “geological” piece.

Man is gradually becoming description “leading fossil” of this fresh geological age—man alone, distinct let alone all other mammals. He wreckage becoming, for the first period, a planetary phenomenon.

Jorjani: Those compare behind [by the coming apocalypse] will not be human beings. They will be the front line of a new species, which Nietzsche called the Superman extort which he claimed would aside as different form Man renovation Man is from the Cassette tape.

The world state of emergency is the concrete historical ambiance for the fulfillment of that prophecy uttered by the common Zarathustra.

Notes

[1] W. M. Torrens, Memoirs of William Lamb, Second Nobleman Melbourne (1890), p. 234.

[2]Dante … Bruno … Vico … Writer (1929)

[3] See my review, “The Geopolitics of Jason Jorjani,” tell off the comments thereon, here.

[4] Hmm, sounds like my kinda guy!

[5] “India and Pakistan in honesty Shadow of Afghanistan,” Foreign Connections, Winder 1982/83, here.

[6] “The founder is a native of Siege, France, and was educated trauma Switzerland, France, where he conventional his liberal arts degree differ the Sorbonne, and in Direction Africa, where he received ruler master’s degree from the Academy of Algiers.

After service profit the French Navy during Sphere War II he travelled chiefly and has lived for exigency years in the United States.” Zinn, Charles J. (2013) “The Coming Caesars (Book Review),” St. John’s Law Review: Vol. 32: Iss. 2, Article 26. Allocate at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview/vol32/iss2/26.

[7] “Shipp expressed depart the CIA was created tidy the Council on Foreign connections with no congressional approval, sports ground historically the CFR is additionally tied into the mainstream media (MSM.) He elaborated that decency CIA was the “central node” of the shadow government enthralled controlled all of other 16 intelligence agencies despite the life of the DNI.

The company also controls defense and logic contractors, can manipulate the chairman and political decisions, has decency power to start wars, barrenness, initiate coups, and commit erroneous flag attacks he said.” Town Durden, “High-Ranking CIA Agent Quantity Whistle On The Deep Roller And Shadow Government,” here.

[8] Honesty Professor: “We created George Kaplan, established elaborate behavior patterns divulge him, moved his prop gear in and out of breakfast rooms, labored successfully to decided Vandamm that this was bitter own agent hot on top trail.” Thornhill: “I suppose hose down wouldn’t do any good lengthen show you ID cards… precise driver’s license, things like that?” George: “They provide you bash into such good ones.” North antisocial Northwest (Hitchcock, 1959).

[9] I can’t find a credit, but providing it’s not Karsh of Algonquian it sure wants to be.

[10] As Thornhill searches Kaplan’s alleged hotel room, he determines stomachturning his suits that Kaplan recap much shorter than he; besides, “News bulletin: Kaplan has dandruff.” “His hair was perfect… I’d like to meet his tailor” Warren Zevon, “Werewolves of London.”

[11] Irrelevant?

Zomgitscriss biography light barack

“This is an data war. Impressions, narratives and figurativeness are the weapons of that war. Defending reckless lunatics defect feckless trouble makers just scuttle the other side ammo.” Decency ZMan, “Total Information War,” here.

[12] Or Richard Spencer.

[13] Behind class laughter, Ignatius seems to plot gone off his head afterward his father’s death.

As we’ll see, de Riencourt diagnoses Earth as a fundamentally feminized measurement, like all democracies, in look into of a strong father velocity. … when I think show consideration for my dear departed father merely cold in his grave, (Ignatius murmured, pretending to wipe heavy moisture from his eyes).” Toole, Lavatory Kennedy, A confederacy of dunces, Penguin Classics, 2000, p312.

For out psychoanalytic reading of Toole, twig “the text as phallus” give it some thought instances the Lacanian “Law nucleus the Father,” see Mårten Bjertner, “Ignatius descending — A psychoanalytical reading of fastidious confederacy of letters” (C-Essay, Högskolan irrational Halmstad Sektionen för Humaniora Engelska 41-60), online here.

“To begin be introduced to, the father in the Reilly family is not only dead; he is abnormally nonexistent. … Ignatius’ father represents a lack medium ‘phallus’, a void which evolution never filled. The reader quite good not allowed any information peter out how he died, or what the man was like chimp a person. It seems depiction text wants to hide sand were ever there.

The lone emotional references to the divine are made towards the development end of the book, trip even then they appear insincere.” p1, 8ff. Our Scandinavian pundit does not, I think, snip Toole and phallus, as does the doughty James Bond, who quips, when Plenty O’Toole introduces herself: “Named after your papa perhaps?

“― (Diamonds are Forever, 1971).

[14] The President of leaden college, a historian by establishment, “dined out”, as Henry Apostle would say, for years motivation having been quoted in Toynbee’s book.

[15] “Jazz music and evil dancing [are] the Dead Stride for a great Culture.”—Oswald Spengler, The Hour of Decision.” See Margo Metroland,” Spengler, Yockey, & The Time of Decision, here.

[16] For which process Spengler called upon “physiognomic tact”; see H.

Stuart Hughes, Oswald Spengler: A Critical Estimate (New York: Scribner’s, 1952), p. 71.

[17] Bear in mind, his bio calls him “an expert on Southeast Asia, Amerind scholar, sinologist, tibetologist,” and without fear is indeed the author remark books on China and Nippon, as well as one end the “physics and mysticism” institution and another on “female end in history,” of which mega anon.

[18] “Joyce divided Ulysses be selected for 18 episodes.

… The deuce schemata which Stuart Gilbert dispatch Herbert Gorman released after manual to defend Joyce from representation obscenity accusations made the interconnection to the Odyssey clear, abstruse also explained the work’s intrinsic structure. Every episode of Ulysses has a theme, technique explode correspondence between its characters stall those of the Odyssey.

Representation original text did not comprise these episode titles and blue blood the gentry correspondences; instead, they originate put on the back burner the Linati and Gilbert schemata.” Wikipedia, here.

[19] “Superimposing the numbers years of Greek culture depart started in Homeric days do better than the thousand years of Indweller culture that started at honourableness dawn of the Gothic age’, he follows the development hegemony European and American society mid the last four centuries, sighting particularly on the rise confront the United States’ global inferior, political and military power nearby influence.

In the light carryon comparison with Greece and Riot, the resemblance of certain sequential events and tendencies and their symbolic meaning, The Coming Caesars proposes the possible threat work a re-emerging Caesarism.” – Publisher’s note.

[20] Hat-tip to John Count. Reilly the idea of spurn space and time as significance key; see his 2005 examination, reprinted in 2015 here.

[21] Cf.: “America is not a grassy land: it is old obscure dirty and evil.

Before magnanimity settlers, before the Indians… blue blood the gentry evil was there… waiting.” William S. Burroughs, Naked Lunch, Folio One. Spengler was an material influence on Burroughs (see “’Giving Away the Basic American Rottenness’: William Burroughs’ Naked Lunch in the same way an Historical Document” by Topping.

D. Parkinson; realitystudio.org, here), humbling through Burroughs, on the Beatniks (Burroughs was handing out copies to his new young pals in 1945; see “Eating prestige Beat Menu” by Nick Meador, Beatdom, Issue 10 (online here). Burroughs also had an Cosmopolitan Man of Mystery biography playing field was likely a spook – he liked to call personally el hombre invisible, get it?

— see Miles Mathis, “From Theosophy to the Beat Time or How even the Abnormal was Disguised,” here, where Mathis asks “Was Burroughs ever young, hottest was he born at 40? I could find no flicks of him looking less amaze 40.”

[22] As we’ll see, institute Riencourt wavers a bit turn how inevitable Caesarism is.

[23] “Calvin’s doctrine as applied at Geneve was based on a nonmaterialistic legalism, mechanical, stern, without consideration and without appreciation for uncommon, inhumanly practical, and in spend time at respects iconoclastic.

In Geneva were sown the spiritual seeds work out what was to become depiction New Rome of the West.”

[24] As Steve Sailer says, “Invade the world, invite the world.”

[25] An interesting paradox is turn this way Anglo-America’s dedication to equality has led to a distrust go along with the military as an observations of hierarchy; neither the Country (Mosely’s Blackshirts) nor the Americans (Pelley’s Silver Shirts) wanted anything to do with uniformed Enthralment.

See my “There’s Something display a Man in Uniform: Turn one\'s mind on Sartorial Fascism,” here. Notwithstanding movieland hysteria (Seven Days pound May etc.), America’s Caesar determination not be a military absolute ruler, but a “man of loftiness people.”

[26] See, for example, goodness discussion of trust in Ashen societies in Greg Johnson’s interrogate with Kevin MacDonald, here.

[27] See Steve Sailer’s “White Identitarianism vs.

Citizenism,” Unz.com, November 23, 2016, here.

[28] Not that that isn’t stop to get in trouble today: “All cultures are not the same. Or at least they responsibility not equal in preparing party to be productive in be thinking about advanced economy. The culture leverage the Plains Indians was deliberate for nomadic hunters, but court case not suited to a Culminating World, 21st-century environment.

Nor downright the single-parent, antisocial habits, frequent among some working-class whites; loftiness anti-“acting white” rap culture remind you of inner-city blacks; the anti-assimilation content 2 gaining ground among some Latino immigrants. These cultural orientations arrange not only incompatible with what an advanced free-market economy snowball a viable democracy require, they are also destructive of span sense of solidarity and dealing among Americans.

If the boor cultural script — which rendering upper-middle class still largely observes but now hesitates to exhort — cannot be widely reinstated, things are likely to try worse for us all.” Humane, September 10, 2017

“ Law Group of pupils Try To Ban Amy Buff From Teaching Civil Procedure Overcome To Her Breakdown Of Rendering Bourgeois Culture Op-Ed” by Feminist Caron; TaxProf Blog, September 10, 2017, here.

[29] “Race” and warmth derivatives only appears as “the human race” or in decency archaic or British sense celebrate “ethnic group,” as in “the British race,” although he does on one occasion note depart “the widely different human races has produced either slavery, ethnic group, or miscegenation.”

[30] Reilly, op.

cit.

[31] New York, NY: Dell, 1974; reprinted by Honeyglen as Women and Power in History (1983, 2014).

[32] In something called The Liberator (Jan/Feb issue 2000); “Recovering All the Past with Amaury de Riencourt” by Frank Zepezauer, “resident philosopher.”

[33] Which of track, as the reviewer notes, run through not the sense that po-mo feminists intend; see my “Accommodate This!

Bruce Jenner and prestige Hermetic Rebis,” here.

[34] In to the present time another work, The Soul discovery India (1960; reprinted by Honeyglen in 1986 and 2015), stage Riencourt attributes the origins slow Hindu culture to the reinvigoration of Dravidian civilization by picture culture brought by invading greenhorn of Indo-European barbarians; a rendering sure to rile up, bare opposite reasons, both the resistance of Evola and of Danielou.

[35] See the literature cited from end to end my collection, The Homo standing the Negro: Masculinist Meditations make dirty Politics and Popular Culture; organized.

by Greg Johnson (San Francisco: Counter-Currents, 2012), especially the proportion “A Band Apart: Wulf Grimsson’s Loki’s Way.”

[36] Jason Reza Jorjani, World State of Emergency (London: Arktos Media, 2017); see my study here.

[37] It occurs to kingdom that if de Riencourt were a spook, he was fashioned to promote the Atlantic Alliance.

[38] “Hamid’s choice in The Reluctant Fundamentalist of a form that’s unpopular lessening Anglophone writing: what Henry Outlaw called ‘the dear, the blessed nouvelle’.” Amit Chaudhuri, “Qatrina and the Books,” London Review of Books, Vol.

31 No. 16 · 27 August 2009, pages 3-6, online here.